Ezekiel asks whether God can still be present when land, temple, leadership, and every familiar structure have failed.
The book answers from exile. Ezekiel, a priest among Judean deportees in Babylonia, sees divine glory arrive on a mobile throne. He announces Jerusalem's fall, confronts corrupt worship and violent leadership, speaks against neighboring powers, and then imagines cleansing, a new heart and spirit, restored shepherding, dry bones revived by breath, the defeat of a final enemy, a renewed sanctuary, and water that heals a damaged land.[1][40][41][47]
Reading boundary: Ezekiel includes graphic sexualized violence, child sacrifice, mass killing, famine, forced migration, bodily humiliation, restricted mourning, national warfare, exclusion, and portrayals of divine violence. Responsible study must not blame victims, authorize abuse, diagnose the prophet casually, identify present peoples as Gog, or turn the throne vision into pseudoscience. The book's hope should not be separated from the trauma and ethical problems it preserves.[52][55][56][69]
Ezekiel quick facts
What is the Book of Ezekiel about?
Ezekiel is a prophetic book about the crisis and reconstruction of a displaced people. Chapters 1-24 explain why Jerusalem and its temple will fall, using visions, allegories, legal arguments, and embodied sign acts. Chapters 25-32 confront foreign nations and imperial pride. Chapters 33-48 turn toward renewed responsibility and restoration: God seeks the flock, cleanses the people, gives a new heart and spirit, revives the dry bones of Israel, defeats Gog, returns to a transformed sanctuary, and sends a river of life through the land. Judgment and hope are both tied to the recognition that Israel's God is present, holy, and free to act beyond Jerusalem.[1][40][44][46]
Who wrote Ezekiel?
The book names Ezekiel son of Buzi, identifies him as a priest, and locates his call among deportees by the Kebar canal. Its dates, priestly concerns, Babylonian setting, and unusual first-person voice make a sixth-century prophetic figure the best historical starting point. Ezekiel is not merely a name later attached to an anonymous collection.[2][40][42][43]
That does not mean the current forty-eight chapters are an untouched transcript. Repeated commissions, expansions, chronological rearrangements, internal tensions, and meaningful differences between Hebrew and Greek editions show scribal preservation and literary shaping. It is most responsible to speak of the historical prophet, followers or scribes who preserved and developed his material, and a deliberately organized written book. The precise stages cannot be reconstructed with certainty.[3][35][36][37][46]
About Buzi: Ezekiel 1:3 calls the prophet "son of Buzi," but Scripture supplies no reliable biography of Buzi. Later traditions should not be turned into historical fact.
When was Ezekiel written?
The opening vision is dated to the fifth year of King Jehoiachin's exile, normally 593/592 BCE. The latest explicit date appears in Ezekiel 29:17, usually 571/570 BCE. Ezekiel 40:1 places the final temple vision in 573/572 BCE. These notices frame about two decades of prophetic activity spanning Jerusalem's destruction in 587/586 BCE.[2][11][17][40]
The Babylonian Chronicle independently records Nebuchadnezzar's 597 BCE capture of Jerusalem, removal of its king, appointment of another ruler, and deportation. Second Kings and Jeremiah narrate the later siege and destruction. The Al-Yahudu tablets then show Judean deportee communities living and working in Babylonia. These sources establish the historical world Ezekiel addresses, though none independently names the prophet.[21][22][23][63][64][65]
"Exile" is useful shorthand, but it can flatten different experiences of forced migration. Ezekiel belonged to a deported community with its own social location, losses, negotiations, and forms of adaptation; his experience should not be made identical to every person displaced from Judah.[43][66]
The book's final literary growth is harder to date. Its sixth-century core is clear, but textual comparison shows that preservation and expansion continued. A study guide should therefore distinguish the dates assigned to oracles from the unknown date when every line reached its final form.[35][36][39]
In what language was Ezekiel written and preserved?
Ezekiel was composed primarily in Biblical Hebrew. Its diction is strongly priestly, but it also includes unusual forms and language that scholars compare with Akkadian and Babylonian intellectual culture. That mixture fits a Judean writer working within a deportee community rather than a prophet detached from his host world.[25][43][48][67]
The Greek title is Iezekiel. Greek Ezekiel is not just a later paraphrase of the medieval Hebrew form. It is a major ancient witness whose shorter readings, sequence, and translation choices sometimes preserve a different stage in the book's textual history.[25][35][36]
What do the Dead Sea Scrolls and Papyrus 967 show?
Six fragmentary Hebrew witnesses are cataloged from Qumran: 1Q9, 3Q1, 4Q73, 4Q74, 4Q75, and 11Q4. They range across Hasmonean and Herodian scribal periods and preserve parts of Ezekiel, not a complete book. Together they confirm an ancient Hebrew tradition while reminding readers that the medieval Masoretic manuscripts are not the only evidence available.[27][28][29][30][31][32]
Papyrus 967 is an early third-century CE Greek codex and the earliest substantial witness to Greek Ezekiel. It places the material now found in 36:16-38 after chapter 38 and lacks several units present in the Masoretic Text. The Old Greek is also shorter in many smaller places. These differences have led scholars to consider whether the Greek translator used a shorter Hebrew edition and whether the longer Hebrew book continued to grow. NETS makes that Greek edition accessible in English and explains its policy of representing the Greek translator's work rather than silently harmonizing it with the Hebrew.[25][26][33][34][35][37]
How is Ezekiel organized?
The familiar judgment-nations-restoration outline helps readers follow the whole book. A second pattern is equally important: divine glory appears in exile, visits and leaves the corrupted temple, and finally returns to a renewed sanctuary. Dates, repeated recognition formulas, and watchman commissions create additional links across the sections. Major commentaries differ over literary development and theology, but they consistently treat the book as an intentionally shaped whole whose parts must be read in sequence.[40][46][47][60][61][62]
What should readers remember from Ezekiel?
- Divine presence is not trapped in one building or defeated by exile.
- Holiness exposes idolatry, violence, exploitation, failed leadership, and polluted institutions.
- Judgment is never a license for readers to punish people they label unfaithful.
- Individuals are called to turn and live; inherited consequences do not equal inherited personal guilt.
- Leaders are shepherds accountable for feeding, protecting, healing, and seeking the vulnerable.
- Restoration begins with divine cleansing, a new heart, a new spirit, and renewed communal life.
- The dry bones represent the exiled house of Israel before they become a later symbol of resurrection.
- Gog is a deliberately malleable final enemy, not a code name that securely identifies a modern nation.
- The final temple vision concerns worship, justice, leadership, land, boundaries, creation, and presence, not architecture alone.
- The last name of the city, "The LORD Is There," answers the book's deepest exile question.
What are Ezekiel's major themes?
Divine glory and presence
Ezekiel's opening is a theological shock: the glory associated with Jerusalem's sanctuary appears in Babylonia. Chapters 8-11 then portray glory leaving a temple filled with corruption, while chapters 43 and 48 imagine return. Presence is neither institutional possession nor geographic captivity.[2][4][5][47]
Holiness, recognition, and the divine name
The repeated statement that people or nations will know the LORD links judgment and restoration. Ezekiel 36 explains restoration through the sanctification of the divine name, not Israel's moral superiority. Holiness confronts desecration and also makes renewed life possible.[13][48][56]
Responsibility and repentance
Ezekiel 18 rejects fatalistic use of ancestral guilt: the person who turns can live. The chapter does not deny communal history or social consequences, but it refuses the claim that change is pointless because another generation sinned.[7][44][52]
Shepherds and just leadership
Chapter 34 condemns leaders who consume the flock. God searches for the scattered, binds the injured, strengthens the weak, judges harmful animals within the flock, and promises a Davidic shepherd. The passage joins care and accountability rather than romanticizing leadership.[12][49][52]
New heart, spirit, and restored creation
Chapters 36-37 move from cleansing and a new heart to breath entering the bones of a despairing people. Chapters 40-48 then widen restoration to sanctuary, land, water, trees, healing, inheritance, and a city defined by divine presence.[13][14][19][59]
Frequently studied passages in Ezekiel
Ezekiel 1:26-28
The likeness of a throne and humanlike divine appearance above the living creatures.
Ezekiel 3:17
The prophet commissioned as a watchman who must hear and warn faithfully.
Ezekiel 11:19
A promise of one heart and a new spirit in place of a hardened heart.
Ezekiel 18:20-23
Personal responsibility, repentance, and God's desire that the wicked turn and live.
Ezekiel 22:30
The search for someone to repair the breach, often quoted apart from its indictment of leaders.
Ezekiel 34:11-16
God seeks scattered sheep, feeds them, binds the injured, and strengthens the weak.
Ezekiel 36:25-27
Cleansing, a new heart, a new spirit, and divine empowerment for covenant life.
Ezekiel 37:1-14
The valley of dry bones and breath restoring the whole house of Israel.
Ezekiel 47:1-12
A river flows from the sanctuary, bringing life, fruit, and healing.
Ezekiel 48:35
The restored city receives the name "The LORD Is There."
Why has Ezekiel been debated?
- Authorship and growth: Scholarship ranges from strong literary unity to complex redaction. The evidence supports a historical Ezekiel and substantial literary shaping, but not a universally accepted reconstruction.[37][40][46]
- Hebrew and Greek editions: Papyrus 967 and the Old Greek preserve shorter readings and a different sequence. Scholars debate whether this reflects another Hebrew edition, translator work, later Hebrew expansion, or multiple processes.[35][36][39]
- Torah and "not good" laws: Ezekiel 20:25-26 sounds as though God gave destructive statutes. Ancient and modern readers have proposed judgment, abandonment to idolatry, polemic against a distorted firstborn law, or a harsher theological claim.[8][72][73][74]
- Rabbinic concern: Early Jewish tradition remembers difficulty reconciling Ezekiel with Torah and caution around the throne vision. Canonical reception did not require pretending the problems were simple.[50]
- Gender and violence: Chapters 16 and 23 have generated sustained feminist and trauma-aware criticism because they portray Jerusalem and Samaria through abused female bodies.[53][69][70]
- Prophecy and Tyre: Ezekiel 29:17-21 recognizes that Nebuchadnezzar obtained no spoil from his campaign against Tyre and grants Egypt as compensation. The internal adjustment is important evidence about prophetic reflection.[10][11][58]
- Temple interpretation: Measurements, sacrifices, land divisions, idealized geography, and a miraculous river have produced literal, constitutional, symbolic, mystical, and eschatological readings in Judaism and Christianity.[59][82][83]
What does Ezekiel's vision of wheels mean?
Ezekiel describes a storm, fire, four living beings, interlocking or intersecting wheels full of eyes, a shining platform, a throne, and a humanlike appearance surrounded by radiance. The language repeatedly uses "likeness" and "appearance," signaling visionary analogy rather than a mechanical diagram. In an ancient world, creatures support thrones, winged guardians mark sacred space, and heavenly platforms express royal presence.[2][57][67][68]
The theological point is not the engineering of the wheels. Divine glory is mobile, aware, ordered, and present with deportees in Babylonia. Modern ancient-astronaut theories remove the vision from its language, genre, temple imagery, and ancient setting. They are not a scholarly alternative to historical interpretation.[43][52][67]
How should readers approach the sexualized violence?
Chapters 16 and 23 personify Jerusalem and Samaria as women whose sexual relationships represent political alliances and idolatry. The rhetoric escalates into exposure, assault, mutilation, and killing. Although marriage and adultery metaphors occur elsewhere in prophetic literature, Ezekiel's versions are unusually graphic and place blame, punishment, and spectacle onto feminized bodies.[6][53][54][69]
A responsible teacher should name what the imagery does, distinguish metaphorical cities from real women, and refuse to repeat its logic against survivors. Translation can intensify or soften the sexual charge, so comparing versions matters. Calling the chapters difficult is not rejecting Scripture; it is refusing to make violence disappear through pious language.[52][69][70][71]
Did God give Israel laws that were not good?
The verses are one of Ezekiel's sharpest interpretive problems. They follow repeated rejection of life-giving statutes and connect "not good" rules with firstborn offerings that defile and horrify. Elsewhere the chapter and book condemn child sacrifice. The wording nevertheless attributes the giving or handing over to God, so the difficulty cannot be solved by pretending it says nothing troubling.[8][45][57]
Major proposals include punitive abandonment to idolatrous customs, a judgment decree rather than Torah, a polemic against a distorted interpretation of firstborn law, and a deliberately severe claim that destructive law became punishment after rebellion. Each proposal answers part of the context; none has ended the debate. The safest conclusion is that Ezekiel rejects child sacrifice while describing divine judgment in language that remains ethically and theologically disturbing.[72][73][74]
Why was Ezekiel forbidden to mourn his wife?
The chapter calls the prophet's wife "the delight of your eyes," announces her death, and restricts customary public mourning. Ezekiel's behavior becomes a sign of the stunned response to the sanctuary's destruction and the deaths of loved ones. The text focuses almost entirely on the prophet's symbolic role and gives his wife no name or voice.[9][55][75]
This episode must not become a command that bereaved people suppress grief. It is an extreme prophetic sign inside a national catastrophe, not a general model for marriage, pastoral care, or funeral practice. Readers should also acknowledge the ethical cost of treating a woman's death primarily as a message about someone else.[52][54]
Is the king of Tyre a description of Satan?
The chapter first addresses the "ruler of Tyre," condemning a human who claims divinity through wealth and wisdom. A lament then portrays the "king of Tyre" with Eden, precious stones, a guardian cherub, holy mountain, beauty, trade, violence, and expulsion. Ancient royal and mythic language magnifies the fall of an imperial ruler.[10][58][78]
Jewish and Christian interpreters have identified the figure in several ways, including Adam, a priestly or angelic being, and Satan. The explicit literary target remains Tyrian kingship. Reading Satan's primordial fall here is therefore a later Christian reception, not a detail readers can assume before examining the oracle against Tyre.[76][77][81]
What does the valley of dry bones mean?
The vision begins with a valley full of very dry bones. At God's command Ezekiel prophesies; bones join, bodies form, and breath enters them. The chapter then supplies its own interpretation: "These bones are the whole house of Israel," whose members say their bones are dry, hope is lost, and they are cut off. Grave opening, spirit, land, and the joined sticks complete a promise of restored peoplehood.[14][54][80]
The image contributed to later Jewish and Christian reflection on bodily resurrection, and that reception deserves study. Its first referent, however, is Israel's national death in exile and God's power to restore a people who can no longer imagine a future. Christian interpretation should not replace Israel with the church or detach the vision from Jewish catastrophe and hope.[50][79][80]
Who are Gog and Magog?
Gog is a leader "of the land of Magog" who gathers a vast coalition against a restored, seemingly secure Israel. God defeats the invaders through earthquake, panic, pestilence, torrential rain, hail, fire, and mutual violence. Burial and cleansing scenes remove the threat before the book turns to the temple vision.[15][16][59]
Gog has no secure historical anchor. That ambiguity made the figure useful for later interpreters who repeatedly projected current enemies onto the text. Revelation 20 reuses Gog and Magog for the nations in a final rebellion, broadening rather than decoding Ezekiel. Identifying Gog confidently with Russia or any present state, ethnicity, or political leader repeats a long pattern of unstable geopolitical appropriation.[51][92]
How should the final temple vision be understood?
A heavenly guide measures gates, courts, rooms, walls, altar, and sanctuary. The glory returns from the east. Regulations order priests, Levites, offerings, the prince, festivals, and land. Water flows from the temple, deepens without tributaries, heals the sea, and feeds trees whose fruit nourishes and leaves heal. Tribal territories are redrawn, resident aliens receive inheritance, and the city is renamed for divine presence.[17][18][19][20]
The vision is concrete enough to invite plans and idealized enough to exceed normal architecture. Scholars and faith communities have read it as a proposed sanctuary after exile, a priestly constitution, a symbolic or heavenly temple, an eschatological building, a mystical map, and a source for Revelation's temple-city. The best first step is to read the whole unit as Ezekiel's integrated vision of sanctity, leadership, worship, land, creation, and presence before deciding how it relates to later fulfillment claims.[49][59][82][83][84]
Boundary and welcome: Ezekiel 44 restricts sanctuary participation and privileges Zadokite priests. Ezekiel 47:22-23, however, commands hereditary land for resident aliens and their children among Israel's tribes. A complete reading must name both the hierarchy and the unexpected inclusion.[18][19][49]
Where does Ezekiel connect with other writings?
- Torah and priestly tradition: Creation, sanctuary, purity, holiness, sacrifice, land, firstborn law, and covenant language connect Ezekiel with Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy, sometimes in agreement and sometimes in tension.[45][48]
- Jeremiah: Both prophets address Babylon, false confidence in Jerusalem, responsibility, covenant, shepherds, and restoration, while their textual forms and communities differ.[23][43][44]
- Isaiah and the Twelve: Oracles against nations, holiness, shepherding, new exodus, spirit, land, and final enemies participate in a broad prophetic conversation.[44]
- Daniel and apocalyptic literature: Heavenly visions, symbolic creatures, empires, angelic interpretation, and final conflict develop in later Jewish apocalyptic worlds, though Ezekiel should not simply be relabeled an apocalypse.
- Revelation: The throne and living creatures, eaten scroll, measured sacred space, revived witnesses, Gog and Magog, measured city, tribal gates, river, trees, healing, and divine dwelling all rework Ezekiel.[89][90][91][92][93][94]
- Babylonian culture: Cosmology, iconography, legal-administrative worlds, canals, deportee settlements, and Akkadian language illuminate Ezekiel's environment without reducing the prophet to a copy of Babylonian sources.[43][63][65][67]
Which communities receive Ezekiel as Scripture?
In the Jewish Bible Ezekiel stands among the Latter Prophets in the Nevi'im. Rabbinic tradition remembers both canonical authority and interpretive caution, especially around the throne vision and apparent legal differences. Ezekiel's chariot imagery, dry bones, temple, covenant, and liturgical verses became enduring parts of Jewish interpretation.[24][50]
Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Ethiopian Orthodox, and Protestant traditions also receive Ezekiel as Scripture, normally among the Major Prophets. Christian liturgy and Revelation draw heavily on the book. Responsible Christian reading should honor Jewish canonical meaning and identify later christological, ecclesial, resurrection, Satan, and end-times interpretations as reception rather than silently replacing the text's exilic setting.[51][52][85][86][87][88]
Fourteen safeguards for studying Ezekiel
- Read the throne vision through ancient royal, temple, and Babylonian imagery, not modern UFO speculation.
- Do not turn symbolic sign acts into casual psychiatric diagnoses of the prophet.
- Name the trauma of siege, forced migration, hunger, loss, and institutional collapse.
- Never use chapters 16 or 23 to blame survivors, shame women, or normalize intimate-partner violence.
- Let Ezekiel 20:25-26 remain a real theological dispute; do not hide its wording.
- Do not use Ezekiel's restricted mourning to silence bereaved people.
- Acknowledge the book's internal reflection on Nebuchadnezzar and Tyre.
- Begin Ezekiel 28 with the ruler of Tyre before explaining later Satan interpretation.
- Read the dry bones first as the whole house of Israel in exile.
- Do not map Gog onto a present nation, war, ethnicity, or political opponent.
- Present multiple temple-vision interpretations and distinguish Ezekiel's horizon from later systems.
- Read sacrificial regulations in their priestly exilic setting before importing Christian debates.
- Name both the sanctuary restrictions in chapter 44 and the resident-alien inheritance in chapter 47.
- Do not assume that identifying trauma makes every violent image therapeutic or ethically uncomplicated.
Passages that reward slower study
Ezekiel 1-3
How do vision, scroll, embodiment, silence, and watchman responsibility shape prophetic speech?
Ezekiel 8-11
What causes divine glory to leave, and how can exile itself become a sanctuary?
Ezekiel 16 and 23
What does the rhetoric reveal about power, gender, empire, shame, and the ethics of metaphor?
Ezekiel 18 and 33
How do individual responsibility, communal history, warning, repentance, and life fit together?
Ezekiel 20:25-26
How do law, judgment, idolatry, firstborn offerings, and divine agency create the passage's difficulty?
Ezekiel 24:15-27
Whose grief is centered, whose voice is absent, and what are the limits of prophetic symbolism?
Ezekiel 28-29
How do imperial pride, Eden imagery, failed expectations, and prophetic revision interact?
Ezekiel 34-37
How do shepherding, cleansing, spirit, land, bones, and reunification define restoration?
Ezekiel 38-39
How does a final enemy function when the text resists secure historical identification?
Ezekiel 40-48
What kind of community emerges when temple, land, leadership, ecology, boundaries, and presence are read together?
Sources and further reading
These sources were independently checked for this guide. Links lead to primary texts, official manuscript records, academic handbooks and commentaries, peer-reviewed studies, historical evidence, and official canon resources. A publisher page confirms a work's identity and scope; individual arguments are presented cautiously where full access is limited.
- USCCB, Introduction to Ezekiel.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 1.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 3.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 8.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 11.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 16.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 18.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 20.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 24.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 28.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 29.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 34.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 36.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 37.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 38.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 39.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 40.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 44.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 47.
- USCCB, Ezekiel 48.
- USCCB, 2 Kings 24.
- USCCB, 2 Kings 25.
- USCCB, Jeremiah 52.
- Sefaria, Ezekiel.
- New English Translation of the Septuagint, Ezekiel.
- NETS, Translation Principles.
- Israel Antiquities Authority, 1Q9.
- Israel Antiquities Authority, 3Q1.
- Israel Antiquities Authority, 4Q73.
- Israel Antiquities Authority, 4Q74.
- Israel Antiquities Authority, 4Q75.
- Israel Antiquities Authority, 11Q4.
- Princeton University Library, Papyrus 967 Ezekiel.
- CSNTM, Rahlfs 967.
- Katrin Hauspie, "Ezekiel," Oxford Handbook of the Septuagint.
- Timothy P. Mackie, "Text-Critical Issues in Ezekiel".
- Ingrid E. Lilly, Two Books of Ezekiel.
- Ashley S. Crane, Israel's Restoration.
- JHS review of Lilly, Two Books of Ezekiel.
- Jacqueline Lapsley and Safwat Marzouk, "Ezekiel".
- Corrine Carvalho, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Ezekiel.
- Marvin A. Sweeney, "Ezekiel in Its Historical Context".
- Dalit Rom-Shiloni, "Ezekiel among the Exiles".
- Anja Klein, "Ezekiel among the Prophetic Tradition".
- Dexter E. Callender, "Ezekiel and Israelite Literary Traditions".
- Ian D. Wilson, "Ezekiel as a Written Text".
- Dale Launderville, "Rhetorical Strategies in the Book of Ezekiel".
- Stephen L. Cook, "Ezekiel and the Priestly Traditions".
- Tova Ganzel, "Priests, Levites, and the Nasi".
- Yedida Eisenstat, "Ezekiel in the Jewish Tradition".
- Andrew Mein, "Ezekiel in Christian Interpretation: Gog, Magog, and Apocalyptic Politics".
- Steven Tuell, "Pastoral Appropriations of Ezekiel".
- Amy Kalmanofsky, "Ezekiel and Gender".
- Rhiannon Graybill, "Embodiment in Ezekiel".
- Ruth Poser, "Ezekiel as Trauma Literature".
- Corrine Carvalho, "Ezekiel's Tangible Ethics".
- Moshe Greenberg, Ezekiel 1-20.
- Moshe Greenberg, Ezekiel 21-37.
- Stephen L. Cook, Ezekiel 38-48.
- Daniel I. Block, The Book of Ezekiel, Chapters 1-24.
- Daniel I. Block, The Book of Ezekiel, Chapters 25-48.
- Paul M. Joyce, Ezekiel: A Commentary.
- British Museum, Babylonian Chronicle BM 21946.
- Metropolitan Museum of Art, "Cyrus and the Judean Diaspora".
- Laurie E. Pearce and Cornelia Wunsch, Documents of Judean Exiles and West Semites in Babylonia.
- C. A. Strine, "Is Exile Enough?".
- Christoph Uehlinger and Susanne Muller Trufaut, "Ezekiel 1, Babylonian Cosmological Scholarship and Iconography".
- Michael Hundley, "Ezekiel's Radical Iconoclasm".
- Bryan Bibb, "There's No Sex in Your Violence".
- Rhiannon Graybill, "Marriage Metaphors in Ezekiel 16 and 23".
- Juliana M. Claassens, "Transforming God-Language in Ezekiel 16".
- Scott W. Hahn and John S. Bergsma, "What Laws Were Not Good?".
- Gili Kugler, "The Cruel Theology of Ezekiel 20".
- Dexter E. Callender, "I Gave Them Laws That Were Not Good".
- Diana Lipton, "Early Mourning? Petitionary versus Posthumous Ritual in Ezekiel XXIV".
- Hector M. Patmore, Adam, Satan, and the King of Tyre.
- C. A. Strine, review of After Ezekiel.
- M. David Litwa, "The Primal Human as Primeval Self-deifier".
- John Day, "Resurrection Imagery from Baal to the Book of Daniel".
- "Hope in Hebrew and Early Christian Sacred Writings".
- Cristian Cardozo Mindiola, "Fabricating the Fall of Satan".
- Steven S. Tuell, The Law of the Temple in Ezekiel 40-48.
- Michael A. Lyons, "Envisioning Restoration: Innovations in Ezekiel 40-48".
- Itzhak Amar, "Gates and Entrances in Ezekiel 40-48".
- Vatican, Catechism of the Catholic Church: The Canon of Scripture.
- Orthodox Church in America, "Canon of Scripture".
- Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, Old Testament canon.
- Orthodox Presbyterian Church, Westminster Confession, chapter 1.
- USCCB, Revelation 4.
- USCCB, Revelation 10.
- USCCB, Revelation 11.
- USCCB, Revelation 20.
- USCCB, Revelation 21.
- USCCB, Revelation 22.
