First Dominos is the Ethiopic Testament of the Lord, not the neighboring Galilee composite.
The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church lists “I book of Dominos” after Abtilis. Ethiopian canon studies and the Beta maṣāḥǝft work record identify it with Kidān za-ʾǝgziʾǝna ʾIyasus Krǝstos, “Testament of Our Lord Jesus Christ,” a sixty-chapter work scholars call Testamentum Domini.[1][2][3][4][5][8]
Identity boundary: “First Book of Dominos” is the traditional English-list label. This guide uses the Ethiopic and critical titles for precision and never substitutes Second Dominos, the separate Testamentum Domini in Galilee.
First Dominos quick facts
Who wrote the First Book of Dominos?
The book presents instruction from the risen Jesus to disciples. Mary, Martha, and Salome participate in the opening revelation. That voice supplies literary and traditional authority; it is not a surviving author signature. The Greek author, Ethiopic translator, and later redactors are anonymous.[7][8][9][10][11][12][13]
Calling the work “anonymous” describes the limits of historical evidence; it does not deny the authority the Ethiopian Orthodox tradition gives the text.
When did the Testamentum Domini take shape?
Most scholarship places the Greek antecedent in the late fourth or fifth century, although exact date and provenance remain contested. The complete versions are later witnesses to that earlier work. A Syriac recension was associated with James of Edessa by 687, while a recently identified Greek fragment offers late-fifth-century evidence without restoring the complete original.[14][15][16][17][19][20]
The work revises traditions also associated with the Apostolic Tradition. That strong literary relationship does not reduce every version to one recoverable source document.[18][21][22][23][24]
How did the work survive?
The work survives completely in Syriac, Arabic, and Ge'ez, with smaller Latin, Georgian, Greek, and Coptic witnesses. The Ge'ez is commonly understood as an early translation from Greek, perhaps in the Aksumite period, but the exact pathway is reconstructed through comparison rather than preserved in a translator's colophon.[7][11][12][13][19][20]
Catalogued codices in Stuttgart, Paris, and London place the work beside the Galilee testament and other church-order material. Their dates and segmentations show a living manuscript collection, not one uniform modern volume.[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]
Translation caution: Rahmani and Cooper-Maclean primarily present Syriac evidence. They are useful comparative witnesses, not direct English translations of Beylot's Ge'ez edition.
How are the sixty chapters arranged?
The Holy Spirit, cosmic distress, signs, and an antichrist figure establish an urgent horizon.
Disciples, including named women, ask questions; the discourse turns toward the church building.
Bishops, presbyters, deacons, ordination, the offering, and initiation receive detailed treatment.
Orders, preparation, baptism, marriage, and care are coordinated through communal roles.
Sickness, poverty, meals, fasting, hours of prayer, and concluding rules shape ordinary practice.
The chapter-level Ge'ez work record, editions, liturgical studies, and Ethiopic reference works control this outline.[6][8][11][14][15][39][40]
What should readers notice?
Spirit and discernment
The opening chapter locates communal order within dependence on the Holy Spirit, not only institutional technique.
Apocalypse and endurance
End-time scenes press readers toward faithfulness. They are not a license for fear campaigns or current-event date setting.
Women in the dialogue
Mary, Martha, and Salome appear as questioners. Their presence should be studied without forcing the work into a modern slogan.
Table, initiation, and prayer
Eucharist, baptism, fasting, and daily prayer bind doctrine to embodied communal rhythms.
Office and accountability
Ordained roles receive detailed expectations. Modern authority still requires safeguarding and transparent accountability.
Widows, sick people, and the poor
The community's treatment of vulnerable people is part of its worship, not an optional program.
Specialist studies of liturgy, women in ministry, magic, law, and the Sinodos help separate the primary text from modern extrapolation.[22][23][25][26][27]
Five claims to carry forward
- First Dominos is the sixty-chapter Mäṣḥafä Kidan or Testamentum Domini.
- The risen Jesus is the literary speaker; the historical human author is unknown.
- A late-fourth- or fifth-century Greek antecedent is likely, but precise date and place are debated.
- Ge'ez is a complete and independent witness that must not be collapsed into the Syriac editions.
- Its call to worship, care, and accountable community must be received with explicit anti-coercion safeguards.
How does First Dominos relate to other church orders?
The Testamentum Domini reworks patterns associated with the Apostolic Tradition: ordination, Eucharistic prayer, initiation, fasting, and care. The relationship is strong, but shared order or vocabulary may reflect source use, adaptation, translation, or a common tradition. Direction must be argued passage by passage.[16][17][18][21]
Within the Ethiopian list, Abtilis precedes First Dominos and Second Dominos follows it. Proximity signals a church-order context, not common authorship or identical content.
What remains uncertain?
Late-fourth- and fifth-century proposals compete; no exact publication record survives.
The small Greek fragment confirms ancestry but cannot reconstruct the whole work.
Ge'ez may derive independently from Greek, yet readings still require comparison with Syriac and Arabic.
Historical rules cannot bypass modern safeguarding, consent, evidence, due process, or civil law.
Why is First Dominos called a New Testament book?
The EOTC official list counts thirty-five New Testament books and places First Dominos among eight broader church-order books. Other Ethiopian descriptions distinguish that broader list from a narrower twenty-seven-book printed New Testament. Both facts must remain visible: the work has real Ethiopian canonical reception, and that reception is not universal.[1][2][3][4][5]
“Broader canon” does not mean secret or recently recovered. It describes a community's reception and enumeration.
Read historically, devotionally, and safely.
- Do not use apocalyptic images to date current wars, identify a living antichrist, induce panic, or solicit money.
- Reject antisemitism, collective Jewish blame, religious harassment, and coerced conversion.
- Reject ableism; disability and mental distress are not impurity, moral failure, or possession.
- Never delay qualified medical or mental-health care because of fasting, ritual, exorcism, or discipline.
- Reject sexual coercion, forced marriage, gendered violence, retaliation, and every return of a survivor to danger.
- Do not let ordination rules bypass safeguarding, evidence, due process, civil law, or professional accountability.
- Receive care for widows, sick people, poor people, and strangers as protection and material support, never surveillance.
- Describe Ethiopian reception without claiming that other churches stole or suppressed the book.
First Dominos frequently asked questions
What does “First Book of Dominos” refer to?
It is the Ethiopian church-list label for the sixty-chapter Ge'ez Mäṣḥafä Kidan, known in scholarship as Testamentum Domini.
Is it a direct transcript of Jesus?
No historical evidence establishes that. The risen-Christ discourse is the anonymous work's literary and traditional authority frame.
Does a complete Greek copy survive?
No. A small Greek fragment survives, while complete versions are known in Syriac, Arabic, and Ge'ez.
Can I use the old English Syriac translation as the Ge'ez text?
No. It is a valuable comparative version, but it must not be relabeled as a direct translation of Beylot's Ethiopic edition.
Is the book part of the EOTC canon?
It appears in the broader thirty-five-book New Testament list, distinct from the narrower printed twenty-seven-book collection.
Sources used for this First Dominos study guide
This evidence set combines Ethiopian church and canon sources, editions and version studies, liturgical research, work records, and individually catalogued Ge'ez manuscripts.
- Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, “The Holy Scriptures”.
- Mikre-Sellassie Gebre-Amanuel, Ethiopian Bible and canon.
- Roger W. Cowley, Ethiopian Orthodox canon.
- Bruk A. Asale, EOTC canon.
- Keon-Sang An, Ethiopian Orthodox biblical canon.
- EOTC, Ge'ez church documents and liturgy.
- Encyclopaedia Aethiopica, “Testamentum Domini”.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, Testament of Our Lord, LIT2461.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, Book of the Covenant, LIT5058.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, Testament in Galilee, LIT2462.
- Robert Beylot, Testamentum Domini éthiopien.
- Pierre Nautin, review of Beylot.
- Roger W. Cowley, review of Beylot.
- Ignatius Ephrem II Rahmani, Testamentum Domini.
- James Cooper and Arthur Maclean, The Testament of Our Lord.
- Alistair Stewart-Sykes, The Testamentum Domini.
- Stewart-Sykes, Testamentum Domini text for students.
- Paul F. Bradshaw, The Apostolic Tradition.
- Simon Corcoran and Benet Salway, Greek fragment.
- René-Georges Coquin, “Testamentum Domini”.
- Bradshaw, Johnson, and Phillips, Apostolic Tradition commentary.
- Aimé Georges Martimort, Deaconesses.
- Kevin Madigan and Carolyn Osiek, women and ministry review.
- Alessandro Bausi, “Senodos”.
- Alessandro Bausi, heritage and originality in the Sinodos.
- Augustine Dickinson, Refutation of Magic.
- Ethiopian Christian legal history.
- Aethiopica 20 manuscript and research notices.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, Stuttgart Oriental folio 49.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, BnF d'Abbadie 51.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, BnF d'Abbadie 90.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, BnF d'Abbadie 199.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, British Library Oriental 793.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, British Library Oriental 795.
- William Wright, Catalogue of Ethiopic Manuscripts.
- EMML Catalogue, volume II.
- University of Hamburg, Beta maṣāḥǝft project.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft open dataset.
- J. M. Harden, Anaphoras of the Ethiopic Liturgy.
- J. M. Harden, Ethiopic Christian Literature.
