Second Dominos preserves two historical layers that must not receive one date.
The EOTC list places “II book of Dominos” after First Dominos. The Beta maṣāḥǝft work record and the Encyclopaedia Aethiopica identify it as the sixty-two-chapter Testamentum Domini in Galilee. Its first eleven chapters are a later apocalypse; chapters 12-62 preserve the ancient Epistula Apostolorum.[1][2][3][4][5][7][8][11]
Layer boundary: the later chapters 1-11 preface and the older chapters 12-62 Epistula form one received Ethiopian book, but they are not one composition from one historical moment.
Second Dominos quick facts
Did the eleven apostles write the Epistle of the Apostles?
The embedded Epistula begins in the collective voice of eleven apostles and then expands into dialogue with the risen Jesus. Some witnesses and editorial descriptions count twelve instead. These voices make a literary claim to apostolic authority; they do not supply a verifiable group signature. The historical author, composite editor, translators, and redactors remain unknown.[9][10][12][13][14][15][16]
The anonymous writer invokes named opponents, especially Simon and Cerinthus, to mark theological boundaries. Those ancient polemics must be explained historically rather than converted into insults for present people.
When were the two layers written?
The Epistula Apostolorum is usually placed in the second half of the second century, often around 160-170, but modern scholars continue to debate its date and location. Egypt, Asia Minor, and Syria have all been proposed. The Galilee preface is much later, commonly assigned to the fourth or fifth century.[11][12][17][18][19][20][21][22]
A prediction measured as “one hundred fifty years” has played a role in dating debates. It is not a reliable countdown for current events. Historical dating must compare the whole textual and manuscript record.
Why is the Ge'ez witness indispensable?
The Epistula was composed in Greek, but no complete Greek copy survives. Its full text is preserved only in Ge'ez. A fragmentary Coptic papyrus and a Latin palimpsest independently control portions of the work. Modern critical study therefore compares Ethiopic, Coptic, and Latin rather than treating any one old translation as self-sufficient.[12][13][14][17][18]
Darrell Hannah argues that linguistic evidence favors an early direct translation from Greek into Ge'ez over a required Arabic stage. This is a serious reconstruction, not a claim preserved in a translator's colophon.[23][24][25]
Catalogued manuscripts in Stuttgart, Paris, and London transmit the two Dominos works in adjacent or related units, with local differences in headings and segmentation.[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]
How does the sixty-two-chapter composite unfold?
A later revelation frames eschatological teaching in a post-resurrection Galilee setting.
The embedded Epistula opens in an eleven-apostle voice and rehearses incarnation, signs, death, and resurrection.
The risen Jesus answers questions about flesh, judgment, faith, and the life to come.
The apostles ask about their mission, future believers, a coming missionary, and the church's endurance.
The dialogue closes with expectation, commissioning, and Jesus' ascent.
The precise chapter numbers follow the received Ethiopic composite; modern presentations of the Epistula alone begin their numbering at a different point.[8][9][10][11][12]
What should readers notice?
Incarnation and bodily resurrection
The work insists that Jesus truly entered embodied life and that resurrection is not merely an escape from bodies.
Memory of Jesus
Miracles, death, resurrection, and instruction are arranged as an apostolic testimony beside developing Gospel traditions.
Questions and revelation
The apostles repeatedly ask what future believers need to know about judgment, mission, and endurance.
Simon and Cerinthus
Named opponents help define the text's theology. Historical polemic should not become modern harassment.
Paul and the gentile mission
A future missionary is anticipated, linking the apostolic circle to the church's expanding mission.
Hope without date setting
Expectation of Christ's return grounds endurance, not a modern prophecy chart.
Recent studies place these themes within second-century Gospel textuality, catechesis, apostolic memory, and the formation of Christian boundaries.[26][27][28][29][30]
Five claims to carry forward
- Second Dominos is the received sixty-two-chapter Testamentum Domini in Galilee.
- Its chapters 1-11 and 12-62 belong to different historical layers.
- The older Epistula Apostolorum is a second-century Greek work complete only in Ge'ez.
- The eleven-apostle voice is literary attribution, not demonstrated joint authorship.
- Its resurrection hope and mission can be studied without prophecy manipulation, polemical abuse, or coercion.
How does the Epistula relate to early Gospel traditions?
The work remembers Jesus through a distinctive combination of letter, Gospel-like narrative, and revelation dialogue. Its four-Gospel language, apostolic voice, anti-docetic emphasis, and anticipation of Paul intersect with second-century debates without making it a missing fifth canonical Gospel.[17][18][23][26][27][28][29][30]
The later Galilee apocalypse reframes that older material. A public guide must preserve the received composite while still naming the historical seam.
What remains uncertain?
Egypt, Asia Minor, and Syria remain proposals; no single location has universal agreement.
Witnesses and editorial conventions vary. Exact claims must name their textual base.
Direct Greek-to-Ge'ez transmission is well argued but not explicitly documented by the translator.
The “one hundred fifty years” saying belongs to ancient expectation and cannot responsibly date modern events.
Why is Second Dominos called a New Testament book?
The EOTC official list places it among thirty-five New Testament books. Ethiopian scholarship also distinguishes that broader enumeration from the narrower twenty-seven-book printed New Testament. Canonical status here names Ethiopian ecclesial reception; it does not mean every Christian community received the work in the same way.[1][2][3][4][5][6]
The book is neither a modern discovery nor evidence that another church secretly removed it. Its survival is a major Ethiopic contribution to early Christian textual history.
Read the apocalypse and polemic without weaponizing them.
- Preserve the later chapters 1-11 and older chapters 12-62 boundary in every historical claim.
- Do not turn “one hundred fifty years” or another passage into a modern countdown, fundraising threat, or obedience test.
- Explain Simon and Cerinthus historically; do not use ancient opponents as labels for harassing present people.
- Reject antisemitism, collective blame, coerced conversion, religious harassment, and spiritual terror.
- Reject hell-threat manipulation, retaliation, coerced confession, and suppression of questions.
- Reject ableism and never replace qualified medical or mental-health care with prophecy, ritual, or discipline.
- Reject sexual coercion, forced marriage, gendered violence, and every use of authority that returns a survivor to danger.
- Honor bodily-resurrection hope without shaming bodies, disability, grief, doubt, or mental distress.
Second Dominos frequently asked questions
What does “Second Book of Dominos” refer to?
It is the Ethiopian church-list label for the sixty-two-chapter Testamentum Domini in Galilee.
Is the entire book second-century?
No. The embedded Epistula Apostolorum is second-century, while the eleven-chapter Galilee preface is probably fourth- or fifth-century.
Why does Ge'ez matter so much?
The complete Epistula survives only in Ge'ez; Coptic and Latin preserve fragments.
Does the text predict a modern date?
No. Ancient chronological sayings belong to historical interpretation and should never become a current countdown or coercive prophecy.
Is Second Dominos part of the EOTC canon?
It appears in the broader thirty-five-book New Testament list, distinct from the narrower printed twenty-seven-book collection.
Sources used for this Second Dominos study guide
This evidence set combines Ethiopian church and canon sources, Ethiopic work and manuscript records, primary editions, version studies, and recent research on the Epistula Apostolorum.
- Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, “The Holy Scriptures”.
- Mikre-Sellassie Gebre-Amanuel, Ethiopian Bible and canon.
- Roger W. Cowley, Ethiopian Orthodox canon.
- Bruk A. Asale, EOTC canon.
- Keon-Sang An, Ethiopian Orthodox biblical canon.
- EOTC, Ge'ez church documents and liturgy.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, Book of the Covenant, LIT5058.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, Testament in Galilee, LIT2462.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, Epistula Apostolorum, LIT1354.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, Epistle of the Apostles, LIT1140.
- Encyclopaedia Aethiopica, Testamentum Domini in Galilee.
- NASSCAL e-Clavis, Epistle of the Apostles.
- Louis Guerrier, Testament in Galilee.
- Carl Schmidt, Gespräche Jesu.
- M. R. James, Epistle of the Apostles translation.
- J. K. Elliott, The Apocryphal New Testament.
- Francis Watson, An Apostolic Gospel.
- Francis Watson, Epistula Apostolorum and its editors.
- Charles E. Hill, The Johannine Corpus.
- Manfred Hornschuh, Studien zur Epistula Apostolorum.
- Walther Pérès, L'Épître des Apôtres.
- Walther Pérès, Epistula Apostolorum study.
- Darrell D. Hannah, four-Gospel canon in the Epistula.
- Beyond Canon: Early Christianity and the Ethiopic Textual Tradition.
- Darrell D. Hannah, Epistula Apostolorum in Ethiopic.
- Julia Lindenlaub, Epistula as a guide for believers.
- Nina Gantenbein, Guides to Those Who Believe.
- Francis Watson, A Gospel of the Eleven.
- Francis Watson, Ordering Gospel Textuality.
- Charles E. Hill, Epistula Apostolorum as an Asian tract.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, Stuttgart Oriental folio 49.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, BnF d'Abbadie 51.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, BnF d'Abbadie 90.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, BnF d'Abbadie 199.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, British Library Oriental 793.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft, British Library Oriental 795.
- William Wright, Catalogue of Ethiopic Manuscripts.
- EMML Catalogue, volume II.
- University of Hamburg, Beta maṣāḥǝft project.
- Beta maṣāḥǝft open dataset.
